Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trade infrastructure and firm location under Cournot competition

The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a two-country four-region setting, this paper analyzes the impact of trade infrastructure on firm locations when they interact weakly in Cournot competition, and capital is perfectly footloose. Trade infrastructure costs are additive in firm production and countries differ in their quality of domestic infrastructure. We show that there is a magnified impact of initial infrastructure difference on firm location choices whenever the market is more integrated internationally or within each country. Trade liberalization promotes regional dispersion in the country with better infrastructure. For the country with poor infrastructure, given the presence of a magnified infrastructure disadvantage, unilateral domestic market integration does not necessarily result in an inflow of firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baldwin RE, Forslid R, Martin P, Ottaviano G, Robert-Nicoud F (2003) Economic geography and public policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrens K (2011) International integration and regional inequalities: how important is national infrastructure?. Manch Sch 79: 952–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrens K, Gaigné C, Ottaviano GIP, Thisse J-F (2007) Countries, regions and trade: on the welfare impacts of economic integration. Euro Econ Rev 51: 1277–1301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrens K, Lamorgese AR, Ottaviano GIP, Tabuchi T (2009) Beyond the home market effect: market size and specialization in a multi-country world. J Int Econ 79: 259–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brander J, Krugman P (1983) A ’reciprocal dumping’ model of international trade. J Int Econ 15: 313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brülhart M (2011) The spatial effects of trade openness: a survey. Rev World Econ 147: 59–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combes P-P, Lafourcade M (2001) Competition, market access and economic geography: structural estimation and predictions for France. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 2894

  • Combes P-P, Mayer T, Thisse J-F (2008) Economic geography: the integration of regions and nations. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozet M, Koenig SP (2004) EU enlargement and the internal geography of countries. J Comp Econ 32: 265–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit AK, Stiglitz JE (1977) Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. Am Econ Rev 67: 297–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (1999) The spatial economy: cities, regions, and international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson G (1998) Regional adjustment to trade liberalization. Reg Sci Urban Econ 28: 419–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head K, Mayer T, Ries J (2002) On the pervasiveness of home market effects. Economica 69: 371–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes TJ, Stevens JJ (2004) Spatial distribution of economic activities in North America. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2797–2843

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanbur R, Zhang X (2005) Fifty years of regional inequality in China: a journey through central planning, reform, and openness. Rev Dev Econ 9: 87–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99: 483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1993) The hub effect: or, threeness in international trade. In: Ethier WJ, Helpman E, Neary JP (eds) Theory, policy and dynamics in international trade. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P, Elizondo RL (1996) Trade policy and the third world metropolis. J Dev Econ 49: 137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limão N, Venables AJ (2001) Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs, and trade. World Bank Econ Rev 15: 451–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mano Y, Otsuka K (2000) Agglomeration economies and geographical concentration of industries: a case study of manufacturing sectors in postwar Japan. J Jpn Int Econ 14: 189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin P, Rogers CA (1995) Industrial location and public infrastructure. J Int Econ 39: 335–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monfort P, Nicolini R (2000) Regional convergence and international integration. J Urban Econ 48: 286–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano G, Tabuchi T, Thisse J-F (2002) Agglomeration and trade revisited. Int Econ Rev 43: 409–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paluzie E (2001) Trade policy and regional inequalities. Pap Reg Sci 80: 67–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puga D (2002) European regional policies in light of recent location theories. J Econ Geogr 2: 373–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puga D, Venables AJ (1997) Preferential trading arrangements and industrial location. J Int Econ 43: 347–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Pose A (2010) Trade and regional inequality. World Bank policy research working paper No. 5347

  • Sanguinetti P, Volpe Martincus C (2009) Tariffs and manufacturing location in Argentina. Reg Sci Urban Econ 39: 155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thisse J-F (2010) Toward a unified theory of economic geography and urban economics. J Reg Sci 50: 281–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng D-Z, Zhao L (2010) Globalization, interregional and international inequalities. J Urban Econ 67: 352–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xi Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, X., Hamaguchi, N. Trade infrastructure and firm location under Cournot competition. Ann Reg Sci 50, 153–167 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-011-0487-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-011-0487-8

JEL Classification

Navigation