Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Esophageal reconstruction using the terminal ileum and right colon in esophageal cancer surgery

Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the outcomes of colon interposition based on our surgical experience.

Methods

We reviewed data from 40 patients who underwent esophagectomy with colon interposition using the terminal ileum and right colon, to treat esophageal cancer, between January 1990 and December 2009.

Results

Transthoracic esophagectomy, transhiatal esophagectomy, and pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy were performed in 31 (77.5%), 8 (20.0%), and 1 (2.5%) patients, respectively. The routes of the colon interposition were posterior mediastinal in 30 (75.0%) patients, retrosternal in 5 (12.5%), and subcutaneous in 5 (12.5%). The median operative time was 450 min (range 320–760 min) and the median blood loss was 755 ml (range 180–3,000 ml). Overall postoperative morbidity involved 18 (45.0%) patients and included esophagoileostomy leakage in 7 (17.5%; minor, n = 4; major, n = 3) and necrosis of the colon conduit in 2 (5%) patients. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 0 and 2.5%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 80, 66, and 66%, respectively.

Conclusions

Our surgical outcomes were acceptable in relation to other published results and the prognosis was favorable. Thus, esophageal reconstruction using the ileum and right colon is useful for patients with esophageal cancer for whom the stomach is not available. We currently perform colon interposition with microvascular anastomoses for grafts via the subcutaneous route to increase the safety of this operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2241–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mariette C, Piessen G, Triboulet JP. Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:545–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pennathur A, Luketich JD. Resection for esophageal cancer: strategies for optimal management. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:751–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Akiyama H, Miyazono H, Tsurumaru M, Hashimoto C, Kawamura T. Use of the stomach as an esophageal substitute. Ann Surg. 1978;188:606–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mine S, Udagawa H, Tsutsumi K, Kinoshita Y, Ueno M, Ehara K, et al. Colon interposition after esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:1647–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Klink CD, Binnebösel M, Schneider M, Ophoff K, Schumpelick V, Jansen M. Operative outcome of colon interposition in the treatment of esophageal cancer: a 20-year experience. Surgery. 2010;147:491–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis PA, Law S, Wong J. Colonic interposition after esophagectomy for cancer. Arch Surg. 2003;138:303–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wada H, Doki Y, Nishioka K, Ishikawa O, Kabuto T, Yano M, et al. Clinical outcome of esophageal cancer patients with history of gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2005;89:67–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sobin LH, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. 6th ed. New York: Wiley; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Köckerling F, Meister R, Gall FP. Vascular anatomic principles of surgery of the terminal ileum. Langenbecks Arch Chir. 1985;366:551–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fernando ED, Deen KI. Consideration of the blood supply of the ileocecal segment in valve preserving right hemicolectomy. Clin Anat. 2009;22:712–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shirakawa Y, Naomoto Y, Noma K, Sakurama K, Nishikawa T, Nobuhisa T, et al. Colonic interposition and supercharge for esophageal reconstruction. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006;391:19–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brennan MF. Current status of surgery for gastric cancer: a review. Gastric Cancer. 2005;8:64–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Swisher SG, Pisters PW, Komaki R, Lahoti S, Ajani JA. Gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2000;1:387–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Metzger J, Degen L, Beglinger C, von Flüe M, Harder F. Clinical outcome and quality of life after gastric and distal esophagus replacement with an ileocolon interposition. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999;3:383–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Popovici ZA. New philosophy in esophageal reconstruction with colon. Thirty-years experience. Dis Esophagus. 2003;16:323–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Isolauri J, Markkula H, Autio V. Colon interposition in the treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;43:420–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fujita H, Yamana H, Sueyoshi S, Shima I, Fujii T, Shirouzu K, et al. Impact on outcome of additional microvascular anastomosis–supercharge–on colon interposition for esophageal replacement: comparative and multivariate analysis. World J Surg. 1997;21:998–1003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Motoyama S, Kitamura M, Saito R, Maruyama K, Sato Y, Hayashi K, et al. Surgical outcome of colon interposition by the posterior mediastinal route for thoracic esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1273–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Doki Y, Okada K, Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Fujiwara Y, Takiguchi S, et al. Long-term and short-term evaluation of esophageal reconstruction using the colon or the jejunum in esophageal cancer patients after gastrectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21:132–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sonneland J, Anson BJ, Beaton LE. Surgical anatomy of the arterial supply to the colon from the superior mesenteric artery based upon a study of 600 specimens. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1958;106:385–98.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Beck AR, Baronofsky ID. A study of the left colon as a replacement for the resected esophagus. Surgery. 1960;48:499–509.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fürst H, Hartl WH, Löhe F, Schildberg FW. Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: an alternative technique based on the use of the right colon. Ann Surg. 2000;231:173–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. DeMeester TR, Johansson KE, Franze I, Eypasch E, Lu CT, McGill JE, et al. Indications, surgical technique, and long-term functional results of colon interposition or bypass. Ann Surg. 1988;208:460–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kolh P, Honore P, Degauque C, Gielen J, Gerard P, Jacquet N. Early stage results after oesophageal resection for malignancy—colon interposition vs gastric pull-up. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;18:293–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cerfolio RJ, Allen MS, Deschamps C, Trastek VF, Pairolero PC. Esophageal replacement by colon interposition. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:1382–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hamai Y, Hihara J, Emi M, Tanabe K, Miyamoto Y, Okada M. Skin tube reconstruction for esophageal defect due to postoperative complication. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:1605–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin FC, Durkin AE, Ferguson MK. Induction therapy does not increase surgical morbidity after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:1783–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kelley ST, Coppola D, Karl RC. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is not associated with a higher complication rate vs surgery alone in patients undergoing esophagectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:227–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. de Delva PE, Morse CR, Austen WG Jr, Gaissert HA, Lanuti M, Wain JC, et al. Surgical management of failed colon interposition. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34:432–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomas P, Fuentes P, Giudicelli R, Reboud E. Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: current indications and long-term function. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:757–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, Peters JH, Chandrasoma P, DeMeester TR. Curative resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 100 en bloc esophagectomies. Ann Surg. 2001;234:520–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. DeMeester SR. Colon interposition following esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2001;14:169–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Knezević JD, Radovanović NS, Simić AP, Kotarac MM, Skrobić OM, Konstantinović VD, et al. Colon interposition in the treatment of esophageal caustic strictures: 40 years of experience. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20:530–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Yoichi Hamai and his co-authors have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoichi Hamai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamai, Y., Hihara, J., Emi, M. et al. Esophageal reconstruction using the terminal ileum and right colon in esophageal cancer surgery. Surg Today 42, 342–350 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0103-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0103-7

Keywords

Navigation