Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical comparison of two suspensory fixation devices for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the operation time required and the clinical outcome 2 years postoperatively, after anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstructions using hamstring tendon grafts fixed with either the EndoButton-CL-BTB® (ECL-BTB) or the EndoButton-CL® (ECL).

Methods

Forty-six patients, who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction, were non-randomly divided into 2 groups. Patients with a combined ligament injury or complete meniscal tear were excluded from this study. In group I, an ECL was used with 23 patients. In group II, an ECL-BTB was used with the remaining 23 patients. In groups I and II, the ECL or ECL-BTB was attached to the femoral ends of the hamstring tendon autografts. In both groups, a polyester tape was connected in series with the tibial ends of the grafts. The patients were examined with standard clinical evaluations at 2 years after surgery.

Results

The operation time in group II was significantly shorter than that in group I (P = 0.0459). Concerning the intra- and postoperative complications, there were no serious complications in either group. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of knee laxity measurements, the peak muscle torque of quadriceps and hamstrings, the Lysholm score and the IKDC evaluation.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the usage of the ECL-BTB for graft preparation significantly shortens the total operation time in comparison with the ECL and that there were no significant differences in the 2-year clinical outcome and the intra- and postoperative complications between the 2 graft preparation procedures of the anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. The ECL-BTB can be an alternative device for the hamstring tendon graft in double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Level of evidence

Prospective comparative cohort study, Level II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Aglietti P, Giron F, Cuomo P, Losco M, Mondanelli N (2007) Single- and double-incision double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:108–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown CH Jr, Wilson DR, Hecker AT, Ferragamo M (2004) Graft-bone motion and tensile properties of hamstring and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament femoral graft fixation under cyclic loading. Arthroscopy 20:922–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Henning CE, Lynch MA, Glick KR Jr (1985) An in vivo strain gage study of elongation of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 13:22–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ibrahim SA, Hamido F, Al Misfer AK, Mahgoob A, Ghafar SA, Alhran H (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstring double bundle graft compared with single bundle procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:1310–1315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kondo E, Yasuda K (2007) Second-look arthroscopic evaluations of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: relation with postoperative knee stability. Arthroscopy 23:1198–1209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kondo E, Yasuda K, Azuma H, Tanabe Y, Yagi T (2008) Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med 36:1675–1687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kousa P, Järvinen TL, Vihavainen M, Kannus P, Järvinen M (2003) The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Part I: femoral site. Am J Sports Med 31:174–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miyata K, Yasuda K, Kondo E, Nakano H, Kimura S, Hara N (2000) Biomechanical comparisons of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures with flexor tendon graft. J Orthop Sci 5:585–592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miyatake S, Kondo E, Tohyama H, Kitamura N, Yasuda K (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of a novel application of a fixation device for bone-tendon-bone graft (EndoButton CL BTB) to soft-tissue grafts in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 26:1226–1232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakano H, Yasuda K, Tohyama H, Yamanaka M, Wada T, Kaneda K (2000) Interference screw fixation of doubled flexor tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction—biomechanical evaluation with cyclic elongation. Clin Biomech 15:188–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Noyes FR, Butler DL, Grood ES, Zernicke RF, Hefzy MS (1984) Biomechanical analysis of human ligament grafts used in knee-ligament repairs and reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:344–352

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Samuelsson K, Andersson D, Karlsson J (2009) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to graft type and surgical technique: an assessment of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 25:1139–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Steiner ME, Hecker AT, Brown CH, Hayes WC (1994) Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation. Comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med 22:240–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stoller DW, Martin C, Crues JV 3rd, Kaplan L, Mink JH (1987) Meniscal tears: pathologic correlation with MR imaging. Radiology 163:731–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tomita F, Yasuda K, Mikami S, Sakai T, Yamazaki S, Tohyama H (2001) Comparisons of intraosseous graft healing between the doubled flexor tendon graft and the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 17:461–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yagi M, Kuroda R, Nagamune K, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2007) Double bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:100–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamanaka M, Yasuda K, Tohyama H, Nakano H, Wada T (1999) The effect of cyclic displacement on the biomechanical characteristics of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 27:772–777

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yasuda K, Tsujino J, Ohkoshi Y, Tanabe Y, Kaneda K (1995) Graft site morbidity with autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Am J Sports Med 23:706–714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yasuda K, Tsujino J, Tanabe Y, Kaneda K (1997) Effects of initial graft tension on clinical outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: autogenous doubled hamstring tendons connected in series with polyester tapes. Am J Sports Med 25:99–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yasuda K, Kitamura N, Kondo E, Hayashi R, Inoue M (2009) One-stage anatomic double-bundle anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the autogenous hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:800–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Kitamura N, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H, Minami A (2004) Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy 20:1015–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

One or more authors have declared a potential conflict of interest or source of funding: Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Japan, donated the fixation devices in this study. Funding was in part provided by the Scientific Research Fund (21500400) from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eiji Kondo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kondo, E., Yasuda, K., Miyatake, S. et al. Clinical comparison of two suspensory fixation devices for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 1261–1267 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1687-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1687-6

Keywords

Navigation